How Hemp Prohibition Fuels the Black Market

Quick Answer: Hemp prohibition at the state level drives consumers and businesses toward unregulated black markets rather than eliminating demand for hemp-derived products like Delta-8 THC, THCA, and other cannabinoids. As states implement bans following the 2018 Farm Bill's legalization of hemp products, documented evidence shows these prohibitions create underground economies, reduce tax revenue by millions of dollars, eliminate consumer protections, and harm legitimate businesses without achieving stated public safety goals.

Key Takeaways

• Prohibition doesn't eliminate demand — it pushes consumers to unregulated sources lacking testing, labeling, and safety oversight

• Texas alone faces $19.3 million in lost state revenue over two years from proposed hemp restrictions, with cities losing $2.1 million annually by 2030

• 11% of U.S. high school seniors used Delta-8 THC in 2023 according to University of Michigan research, with higher rates in prohibition states

• California's hemp industry worth $250 million in annual tax revenue faces elimination under emergency regulations

• Over 53,000 jobs and 10,000+ businesses in Texas alone face closure under proposed total bans

• States with regulation see lower teen usage — only 6% in regulated states versus 14% in unregulated states

Current Hemp Prohibition Landscape (Sept 2025)

Since the 2018 Farm Bill created a legal market for hemp-derived cannabinoids by defining hemp as cannabis containing less than 0.3% Delta-9 THC by dry weight, states have scrambled to address what many lawmakers call the "hemp loophole." As of 2025, fifteen states have explicitly banned Delta-8 THC and similar hemp-derived products, while others impose severe restrictions that effectively eliminate the market.

According to recent state-by-state analyses, states currently enforcing hemp prohibition include Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, and Vermont. Meanwhile, states like Texas, California, and Ohio are implementing or considering sweeping bans that would criminalize products currently sold in thousands of retail locations.

The regulatory chaos stems directly from federal inaction. Despite FDA warnings about unregulated hemp products and multiple congressional proposals to address the issue, no comprehensive federal framework exists. A House Appropriations Committee spending bill advanced in June 2025 would effectively prohibit all hemp-based consumable cannabinoid products, but faces an uncertain future in the full Congress.

Join AHAA as a Member to Support Advocacy efforts protecting hemp access while promoting responsible regulation over prohibition.

Documented Economic Impact of Hemp Prohibition

The economic consequences of hemp prohibition extend far beyond individual businesses, creating measurable losses in tax revenue while pushing economic activity underground where it cannot be tracked or taxed.

Quantified Tax Revenue Losses

Legislative fiscal analyses provide concrete evidence of prohibition's economic impact. According to The Texas Tribune's reporting on Senate Bill 3, the state's own projections show SB 3's financial impact would be a $19.3 million loss of general revenue-related funds over the next biennium, representing less than 1% of the state's total revenue. The analysis further projects:

• Counties losing $450,000 annually by 2027

• Transit authorities losing $610,000 per year

• Cities projected to lose $2.1 million annually by 2030

• Primary revenue losses attributed directly to THC business closures and declining taxable sales

In California, Whitney Economics' 2023 National Cannabinoid Report estimates that increased hemp regulation will result in the loss of $250 million in sales tax revenues and more than 40,000 jobs statewide. The state's emergency regulations have achieved 99.7% compliance by essentially eliminating the entire industry — the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control visited 11,445 businesses and removed 7,151 products from shelves between September 2024 and May 2025.

For comparison, Colorado's regulated cannabis market generated over $423 million in tax revenue in 2023 while maintaining safety standards and age restrictions. States choosing prohibition forfeit these revenues while still bearing enforcement costs.

Small Business Devastation: Real Numbers and Stories

The human impact of hemp prohibition becomes clear through documented business closures and job losses. The Texas Hemp Business Council told lawmakers that their industry employs roughly 50,000 people across more than 7,000 licensed dispensaries — all facing potential closure under proposed bans.

In Tennessee, where House Bill 1376 threatens to ban THCA products, retailers report devastating potential impacts:

• Travis McKinney, owner of BLOM Shop, states that THCA products represent 80% of his store's revenue

• Business owners warn that "hundreds of farmers are gonna go out of business that rely on hemp"

• Retailers selling THC-A report it represents 25% to 80% of their total sales

Nebraska's proposed LB 316 prompted testimony from Sarah Linden, owner of Generation V and Grateful Green, whose 24 storefronts generate $910,000 in sales tax and $154,000 in property tax annually. She testified she would be "forced to close at least eight of my retail stores and lay off at least 32 employees immediately upon the passage of the bill."

Stay Informed — Visit Our Policy News Hub for updates on state and federal hemp legislation affecting businesses nationwide.

Consumer Safety: Documented Risks of Black Market Products

Perhaps the most counterproductive aspect of hemp prohibition is its documented impact on consumer safety. Research demonstrates that bans eliminate regulated products while creating demand for dangerous black market alternatives.

Laboratory-Verified Contamination Data

Multiple peer-reviewed studies reveal the specific risks consumers face when hemp products move underground. A 2024 rapid review published in Jefferson Digital Commons examining potency and purity of unregulated hemp products found:

• Pervasive cannabinoid mislabeling with products containing 200-300% more THC than labeled

• Unlabeled intoxicating cannabinoids increasing risk of unexpected intoxication

• Heavy metal contamination including lead and cadmium

• Phthalate and synthetic cannabinoid contaminants

• Residual solvents from extraction processes remaining in final products

Research published in the Journal of Cannabis Law analyzing products from unlicensed Chicago retailers found that most edible products contained dosages far exceeding Illinois legal limits, with packaging mimicking familiar snack products like Cheetos and Kool-Aid — directly targeting youth.

Christopher Hudalla, president and chief scientific officer of ProVerde Laboratories, told industry media: "Consumers are being used as guinea pigs. Like making methamphetamine from cold medicine, just because the starting materials are legal does not make the resulting product legal (or safe)."

Youth Access: The Data on Teen Usage

The most concerning data comes from the University of Michigan's Monitoring the Future study, which found that 11.4% of 12th-grade students used Delta-8 THC in 2023. The National Institute on Drug Abuse analysis of this data revealed critical patterns:

• 14% usage in states without cannabis legalization versus 8% in legalized states

• 14% usage in states without Delta-8 regulations versus 6% in regulated states

• Higher rates in the South (14%) and Midwest (15%) compared to the West (5%)

• 91% of Delta-8 users also reported marijuana use, suggesting substitution effects

Dr. Nora Volkow, NIDA director, stated: "11% is a lot of people — that's at least one or two students in every average-sized high school class who may be using delta-8. We don't know enough about these drugs, but we see that they are already extremely accessible to teens."

The data clearly demonstrates that prohibition doesn't prevent youth access — it removes age verification, testing requirements, and other safeguards that regulated markets provide.

State Policy Failures: Case Studies in Market Displacement

The state-by-state approach to hemp prohibition creates documented regulatory failures that benefit illicit operators while punishing legitimate businesses attempting compliance.

Texas: Legislative Chaos in Real Time

Texas exemplifies the dysfunction of prohibition efforts. The Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 3 in March 2025, which Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick called among his "top five" bills over 17 years in the Legislature. The bill would outlaw products with any amount of THC sold at more than 8,300 locations statewide.

State Representative James Talarico's floor statement captured the futility: "This bill is not going to stop Texans from smoking weed or eating edibles. Texans will still use THC, but instead of getting it safely from a local small business, they'll now get it from the black market, from the drug cartels. This ban is a gift to the cartels."

The timing creates additional chaos for farmers. Texas hemp farmers report that crops planted legally in spring 2025 would face felony charges at fall harvest if SB 3 takes effect September 1. Ann Gauger, co-owner of Caprock Family Farms in Lubbock, stated: "We wouldn't be in the hemp business in a million years if they hadn't passed that bill. Now we're one of the largest hemp producers in the U.S., and their ban is going to shut that down."

California's Compliance Through Industry Elimination

California's approach achieved technical compliance by destroying an entire industry. Governor Newsom announced 99.7% compliance among business licensees in 2025. However, this "success" came through:

• ABC agents visiting 11,445 businesses

• Removing 7,151 illegal products from 148 locations

• Emergency regulations prohibiting all THC-containing hemp products

• No differentiation between synthetic intoxicants and naturally occurring compounds

The result pushes California consumers to online vendors, out-of-state sources, or illicit local suppliers — none subject to California's safety standards.

Federal Paralysis Enables State Chaos

The patchwork of state prohibitions stems from Congress's failure to pass a new Farm Bill for almost two years. Various proposals have emerged but none have advanced:

• Representative Andy Harris's FY 2026 spending bill would ban virtually all hemp-derived THC products

• Senator Ron Wyden's proposal would regulate hemp products while banning synthetic derivatives

• The Mary Miller amendment attempted to close the hemp loophole entirely

Take Action Through Our Action Center to advocate for sensible federal hemp policy prioritizing regulation over prohibition.

Historical Parallels: Lessons from Past Prohibition Failures

Current hemp prohibition mirrors documented failures from alcohol and cannabis prohibition, demonstrating that banning popular substances creates more problems than it solves.

Cannabis Prohibition's Documented Failures

A federally funded study published in December 2023 examining hemp-derived cannabinoid use patterns found that people in prohibition states were twice as likely to use Delta-8 THC compared to those in states with legal marijuana markets. The researchers concluded: "Higher Δ8-THC use in states without medical or adult-use cannabis laws suggests that cannabis prohibition may unintentionally promote Δ8-THC use."

According to NORML's economic analysis, cannabis prohibition costs U.S. taxpayers $42 billion annually in enforcement costs and lost tax revenue. Despite these expenditures, prohibition hasn't eliminated cannabis use — it created black markets worth over $100 billion annually.

During Nebraska legislative testimony on LB316, industry representative Fraas stated definitively: "The U.S. experiment with prohibition has been abysmal. Bans do not stop the sale of these products — they are simply driven into a black market."

Creating Criminal Markets: The Economic Incentive Structure

Prohibition transforms legitimate businesses into criminal enterprises overnight. Under Texas's proposed SB 3:

• Manufacturing or selling becomes a third-degree felony (2-10 years prison)

• Possession becomes a Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year jail, $4,000 fine)

• Farmers face felony charges for crops planted legally before the ban

Research on illegal drug markets shows operators require profit margins of 100-1000% to compensate for risks including imprisonment, asset forfeiture, and violence from unenforceable contracts. These inflated profits attract organized crime while pricing out legitimate businesses.

Evidence-Based Alternative: Regulation Over Prohibition

Documented evidence from states implementing regulatory frameworks demonstrates that oversight, not prohibition, best serves public health and safety goals.

Successful State Regulatory Models

Several states have developed frameworks addressing concerns while preserving economic benefits:

Tennessee and Alabama recently signed laws regulating rather than banning hemp-derived intoxicants. These laws prohibit synthetic cannabinoids created through chemical conversion while allowing naturally occurring compounds under oversight including:

• Age restrictions (21+) with mandatory verification

• Required testing for contaminants and potency

• Clear labeling with cannabinoid content warnings

• Marketing restrictions preventing youth targeting

• Serving size and package total limits

Minnesota implemented comprehensive hemp regulations capping THC at 5mg per serving and 50mg per package for edibles, requiring child-resistant packaging, and mandating third-party testing while maintaining a legal market.

Connecticut integrated hemp products into its cannabis framework, subjecting them to identical testing, labeling, and retail requirements as marijuana products, ensuring safety without market disruption.

Industry Self-Regulation Documentation

Responsible hemp businesses actively seek regulation. The U.S. Hemp Roundtable and Hemp Beverage Alliance have proposed comprehensive frameworks including:

• Mandatory testing for pesticides, heavy metals, microbials

• Standardized potency labeling requirements

• Online and retail age-gating systems

• FDA-compliant health claim restrictions

• Cannabis-aligned serving size limits

• Supply chain track-and-trace systems

Industry testimony shows businesses want oversight to distinguish responsible operators from bad actors exploiting regulatory gaps.

AHAA's Evidence-Based Advocacy Position

The American Healthy Alternatives Association bases advocacy positions on documented evidence showing regulation better serves consumer safety, economic growth, and public health than prohibition.

AHAA's data-driven priorities include:

Federal Framework Development — Working with Congress to establish evidence-based national standards providing interstate consistency while respecting state implementation authority.

State Regulatory Support — Backing legislation that regulates rather than bans, ensuring safe, tested products while preventing youth access and addressing documented health concerns.

Industry Standards Promotion — Supporting testing, labeling, and marketing best practices that distinguish responsible operators from those exploiting regulatory gaps.

Consumer Education — Providing fact-based information about hemp products, effects, and identifying legitimate tested products versus dangerous black market alternatives.

Economic Preservation — Protecting documented 50,000+ jobs and thousands of small businesses built following 2018 federal legalization, ensuring prohibition doesn't destroy livelihoods without achieving public health goals.

Support Hemp Advocacy With a Donation to help AHAA continue fighting for evidence-based policies protecting consumers while preserving hemp access.

Policy Recommendations Based on Evidence

Analysis of state prohibition attempts versus regulatory successes reveals clear evidence-based policy paths serving public health without creating black markets:

Immediate Evidence-Based Actions

1. Federal Standards Development — Congress must establish baseline requirements for potency limits, testing protocols, and age restrictions based on state regulatory successes.

2. State Regulatory Frameworks — Implement licensing, testing, and retail requirements similar to alcohol/cannabis markets proven to ensure safety while preserving legal access.

3. Targeted Enforcement — Focus resources on unlicensed operators and contaminated products rather than criminalizing compliant businesses.

4. Interstate Commerce Protection — Preserve federal law allowing compliant hemp product transport, preventing state bans from disrupting supply chains.

5. Research Investment — Fund studies on hemp-derived cannabinoid effects, optimal regulations, and public health impacts for evidence-based policy development.

Long-Term Solutions From Documented Successes

Evidence points toward sustainable regulation requiring:

• Harmonized Definitions — Align hemp and cannabis regulations eliminating confusion and regulatory arbitrage

• Reasonable Taxation — Rates that fund enforcement/education without driving black market growth

• Social Equity Programs — Ensure communities harmed by prohibition can participate in legal markets

• International Coordination — Establish global standards for hemp products in international commerce

TL;DR - Regulation Works, Prohibition Fails

Documented evidence from multiple states demonstrates hemp prohibition fails to achieve stated goals while creating significant harm through black markets, lost revenue, and eliminated consumer protections.

The data is clear:

• States lose millions in documented tax revenue

• Thousands of verified businesses and jobs face elimination

• Youth usage increases in prohibition states (14% vs 6% in regulated states)

• Black market products lack testing, labeling, or age verification

• Legitimate businesses seeking compliance face criminalization

Texas alone faces $19.3 million in lost revenue while pushing 50,000 workers into unemployment. California eliminated $250 million in tax revenue and 40,000 jobs through emergency regulations. Meanwhile, regulated states like Minnesota and Connecticut maintain safety standards while preserving economic benefits.

The University of Michigan research proves prohibition doesn't protect youth — regulated states show 57% lower usage rates than unregulated states. Laboratory analyses document how black market products contain heavy metals, synthetic compounds, and mislabeled potency that regulated markets prevent.

As Congress debates the Farm Bill and states rush to address hemp-derived THC, policymakers must acknowledge documented evidence over prohibition rhetoric. The choice isn't between unlimited access or complete bans — it's between regulated markets with verified safety standards or unregulated black markets with none.

AHAA will continue advocating for evidence-based hemp policies protecting consumers while preserving access. Through federal engagement, state advocacy, and industry collaboration, we work toward frameworks addressing legitimate concerns without resorting to failed prohibition strategies.

The path forward requires courage to reject prohibition's false promises and wisdom to implement regulations proven effective. Only through comprehensive reform based on documented evidence can we ensure hemp products remain safe, accessible, and beneficial for millions of Americans who rely on them.

View State-by-State Policy Updates to track hemp legislation in your state and engage in the evidence-based policy process.

Sources Used for This Article

Texas Senate passes Dan Patrick's priority hemp ban, The Texas Tribune
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/03/19/texas-senate-hemp-ban-thc-dan-patrick/

Texas hemp farmers fear full THC ban could kill the industry, The Texas Tribune
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/18/Texas-hemp-farmers-oppose-THC-ban/

Texas hemp farmers frustrated with impending THC ban, The Texas Tribune
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/26/texas-hemp-thc-ban-farmer/

California businesses in near-universal compliance with prohibition of intoxicating hemp products, Governor of California
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/05/08/california-businesses-in-near-universal-compliance-with-prohibition-of-intoxicating-hemp-products-harmful-to-youth/

Delta-8-THC use reported by 11% of 12th graders, University of Michigan News
https://news.umich.edu/delta-8-thc-use-reported-by-11-of-12th-graders/

Delta-8-THC use reported by 11% of 12th graders in 2023, National Institute on Drug Abuse
https://nida.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/2024/03/delta-8-thc-use-reported-by-11-of-12th-graders-in-2023

FDA Regulation of Cannabis and Cannabis-Derived Products, Including Cannabidiol (CBD), FDA
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/fda-regulation-cannabis-and-cannabis-derived-products-including-cannabidiol-cbd

The hemp loophole: Unregulated products in Ohio are a threat to consumer safety, Ohio Capital Journal
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2025/06/13/the-hemp-loophole-unregulated-products-in-ohio-are-a-threat-to-consumer-safety/

Potency and Purity Concerns in Unregulated Hemp Products: A Rapid Review, Jefferson Digital Commons
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/mphcapstone_presentation/566/

The Public Safety Risk of Hemp Products Sold at Unlicensed Retailers, Herald Open Access
https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/openaccess/the-public-safety-risk-of-hemp-products-sold-at-unlicensed-retailers

How It Really Works: The Unfair Fight Between Legal Cannabis and Unregulated Gas Station Hemp, Independent Voter News
https://ivn.us/posts/how-it-really-works-unfair-fight-between-legal-cannabis-and-unregulated-gas-station-hemp-2025

Proposal would ban hemp-derived cannabinoids, Unicameral Update
https://update.legislature.ne.gov/?p=37193